NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (9) and where Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
9 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
1 advantage≈ $400
9.7Display5.6
9.0Battery life7.3
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.6
8.6Build & durability5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProInstinct 3 50mm AMOLED
48 × 481450 × 5014.4
T-Rex 3 ProInstinct 3 50mm AMOLEDDifference
Height48 mm50 mm−2 mm
Width48 mm50 mm−2 mm
Thickness14 mm14.4 mm−0.4 mm
Weight74 g59 g+16 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. GPS battery life85 h vs 40 h2.1×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 24 days+4%
  3. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED: No
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.3″+15%
  5. Sport profiles180 vs 96+88%
  6. Pixel density466 ppi vs 320 ppi+46%
  7. GPS battery life (dual-band)38 h vs 30 h+27%
  8. Resolution (width)480 px vs 416 px+15%
  9. Thickness14 mm vs 14.4 mm+3%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. Weight74.5 g vs 59 g+26%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare