NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs Race

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Suunto Race

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (8) and where Race wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
8 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race
Suunto · 2023Race
8.6Score
2 advantages≈ $320
9.7Display4.8
9.0Battery life8.6
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.4
8.6Build & durability8.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProRace
48 × 481449 × 4913.3
T-Rex 3 ProRaceDifference
Height48 mm49 mm−1 mm
Width48 mm49 mm−1 mm
Thickness14 mm13.3 mm+0.7 mm
Weight74 g83 g−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than Race?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 20.8 days+20%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race: No
  3. GPS battery life85 h vs 65 h+31%
  4. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  5. Weight74.5 g vs 83 g+11%
  6. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.43″+5%
  7. Pixel density466 ppi vs 326 ppi+43%
  8. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Race better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. GPS battery life (dual-band)38 h vs 50 h+32%
  2. Thickness14 mm vs 13.3 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare