NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs Vertical

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Suunto Vertical

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (7) and where Vertical wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Suunto Vertical
Suunto · 2023Vertical
8.3Score
3 advantages≈ $400
9.7Display4.4
9.0Battery life9.5
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.4
8.6Build & durability7.9
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProVertical
48 × 481449 × 4913.6
T-Rex 3 ProVerticalDifference
Height48 mm49 mm−1 mm
Width48 mm49 mm−1 mm
Thickness14 mm13.6 mm+0.4 mm
Weight74 g86 g−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than Vertical?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 20.8 days+20%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Vertical: No
  3. Pixel density466 ppi vs 200 ppi2.3×
  4. Weight74.5 g vs 86 g+15%
  5. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  6. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.4″+7%
  7. Resolution (width)480 px vs 280 px+71%

Why is Vertical better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. GPS battery life85 h vs 90 h+6%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)38 h vs 65 h+71%
  3. Thickness14 mm vs 13.6 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare