NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 Pro vs Vertical 2

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro vs Suunto Vertical 2

What T-Rex 3 Pro does better (7) and where Vertical 2 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3 Pro
Amazfit · 2025T-Rex 3 Pro
9.6Score
7 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
2 advantages≈ $640
9.7Display6.3
9.0Battery life8.5
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.4
8.6Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3 ProVertical 2
48 × 481449 × 4913.6
T-Rex 3 ProVertical 2Difference
Height48 mm49 mm−1 mm
Width48 mm49 mm−1 mm
Thickness14 mm13.6 mm+0.4 mm
Weight74 g87 g−12 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 Pro better than Vertical 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 20 days+25%
  2. GPS battery life85 h vs 75 h+13%
  3. Weight74.5 g vs 87 g+17%
  4. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  5. Pixel density466 ppi vs 311 ppi+50%
  6. Battery capacity700 mAh vs 620 mAh+13%
  7. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Vertical 2 better than T-Rex 3 Pro?

  1. GPS battery life (dual-band)38 h vs 65 h+71%
  2. Thickness14 mm vs 13.6 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare