NewXiaomi Watch S5 41mm added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs Descent Mk3i 51mm

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Garmin Descent Mk3i 51mm

What T-Rex 3 does better (7) and where Descent Mk3i 51mm wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
9.6Score
7 advantages
Higher score
vs
Garmin Descent Mk3i 51mm
Garmin · 2023Descent Mk3i 51mm
9.6Score
1 advantage≈ $1,600
8.4Display7.4
8.3Battery life8.4
4.9Health tracking9.4
9.4Sports & outdoor7.2
8.4Build & durability9.6
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3Descent Mk3i 51mm
48.5 × 48.513.851 × 5116.4
T-Rex 3Descent Mk3i 51mmDifference
Height48.5 mm51 mm−2.5 mm
Width48.5 mm51 mm−2.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm16.4 mm−2.6 mm
Weight68 g78 g−10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Descent Mk3i 51mm?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 25 days+8%
  2. Weight68.3 g vs 77.8 g+14%
  3. Sport profiles177 vs 98+81%
  4. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.4″+7%
  5. Battery saver mode40 days vs 31 days+29%
  6. Thickness13.8 mm vs 16.4 mm+19%
  7. Resolution (width)480 px vs 454 px+6%

Why is Descent Mk3i 51mm better than T-Rex 3?

  1. Water resistance10 ATM vs 20 ATM2×
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare