NewXiaomi Watch S5 41mm added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Garmin Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating

What T-Rex 3 does better (5) and where Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
9.6Score
5 advantages
Higher score
vs
Garmin Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating
9.2Score
2 advantages≈ $1,600
8.4Display7.4
8.3Battery life9.4
4.9Health tracking9.4
9.4Sports & outdoor9.3
8.4Build & durability6.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating
48.5 × 48.513.851 × 5114.7
T-Rex 3Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote CoatingDifference
Height48.5 mm51 mm−2.5 mm
Width48.5 mm51 mm−2.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm14.7 mm−0.9 mm
Weight68 g94 g−26 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating?

  1. Weight68.3 g vs 94 g+38%
  2. Screen size1.5″ vs 1.4″+7%
  3. Sport profiles177 vs 102+74%
  4. Thickness13.8 mm vs 14.7 mm+7%
  5. Resolution (width)480 px vs 454 px+6%

Why is Tactix 8 51mm AMOLED Cerakote Coating better than T-Rex 3?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 29 days+7%
  2. Battery saver mode40 days vs 41 days+2%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare