NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex 3 vs Race 2

Amazfit T-Rex 3 vs Suunto Race 2

What T-Rex 3 does better (5) and where Race 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex 3
Amazfit · 2024T-Rex 3
8.4Score
5 advantages≈ $280
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
3 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
8.3Display6.3
6.9Battery life8.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
9.4Sports & outdoor6.4
8.4Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex 3Race 2
48.5 × 48.513.849 × 4912.5
T-Rex 3Race 2Difference
Height48.5 mm49 mm−0.5 mm
Width48.5 mm49 mm−0.5 mm
Thickness13.8 mm12.5 mm+1.2 mm
Weight68 g76 g−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex 3 better than Race 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)27 days vs 18 days+50%
  2. Weight68.3 g vs 76 g+11%
  3. Sport profiles170 vs 95+79%
  4. Pixel density322 ppi vs 311 ppi+4%
  5. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Race 2 better than T-Rex 3?

  1. GPS battery life28 h vs 65 h2.3×
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)42 h vs 55 h+31%
  3. Thickness13.8 mm vs 12.5 mm+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare