NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs Enduro 3

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Garmin Enduro 3

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (5) and where Enduro 3 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Garmin Enduro 3
Garmin · 2024Enduro 3
8.4Score
4 advantages≈ $800
8.7Display4.4
8.2Battery life9.6
9.6Health tracking8.3
9.5Sports & outdoor7.0
4.1Smart features6.5
9.0Build & durability9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarEnduro 3
51.4 × 51.414.551 × 5115.7
T-Rex Dual SolarEnduro 3Difference
Height51.4 mm51 mm+0.4 mm
Width51.4 mm51 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm15.7 mm−1.2 mm
Weight69 g63 g+6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Enduro 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Enduro 3: No
  2. Sport profiles180 vs 97+86%
  3. Pixel density353 ppi vs 200 ppi+76%
  4. Resolution (width)466 px vs 280 px+66%
  5. Thickness14.5 mm vs 15.7 mm+8%

Why is Enduro 3 better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 36 days+44%
  2. Weight69 g vs 63 g+10%
  3. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.4″+6%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)41 h vs 60 h+46%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare