NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs Vertical 2

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Suunto Vertical 2

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (5) and where Vertical 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
5 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
3 advantages≈ $640
8.7Display6.3
8.2Battery life8.5
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.4
9.0Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarVertical 2
51.4 × 51.414.549 × 4913.6
T-Rex Dual SolarVertical 2Difference
Height51.4 mm49 mm+2.4 mm
Width51.4 mm49 mm+2.4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm13.6 mm+0.9 mm
Weight69 g87 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Vertical 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 20 days+25%
  2. Weight69 g vs 87 g+26%
  3. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  4. Pixel density353 ppi vs 311 ppi+14%
  5. Battery capacity660 mAh vs 620 mAh+6%

Why is Vertical 2 better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.5″+14%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)41 h vs 65 h+59%
  3. Thickness14.5 mm vs 13.6 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare