NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Vertical 2

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Suunto Vertical 2

What T-Rex Ultra 2 does better (5) and where Vertical 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
5 advantages≈ $550
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
8.8Display6.3
8.2Battery life8.5
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.4
7.3Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Ultra 2Vertical 2
51 × 5114.349 × 4913.6
T-Rex Ultra 2Vertical 2Difference
Height51 mm49 mm+2 mm
Width51 mm49 mm+2 mm
Thickness14.3 mm13.6 mm+0.7 mm
Weight89 g87 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than Vertical 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 20 days+50%
  2. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  3. Battery capacity870 mAh vs 620 mAh+40%
  4. Pixel density322 ppi vs 311 ppi+4%
  5. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Vertical 2 better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. GPS battery life40 h vs 75 h+88%
  2. Weight89.2 g vs 87 g+3%
  3. GPS battery life (dual-band)50 h vs 65 h+30%
  4. Thickness14.3 mm vs 13.6 mm+5%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare