NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Race 2

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2 vs Suunto Race 2

What T-Rex Ultra 2 does better (4) and where Race 2 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Ultra 2
9.3Score
4 advantages≈ $550
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
4 advantages≈ $510
8.8Display6.3
8.2Battery life8.0
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.4
7.3Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Ultra 2Race 2
51 × 5114.349 × 4912.5
T-Rex Ultra 2Race 2Difference
Height51 mm49 mm+2 mm
Width51 mm49 mm+2 mm
Thickness14.3 mm12.5 mm+1.8 mm
Weight89 g76 g+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra 2 better than Race 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)30 days vs 18 days+67%
  2. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  3. Pixel density322 ppi vs 311 ppi+4%
  4. Resolution (width)480 px vs 466 px+3%

Why is Race 2 better than T-Rex Ultra 2?

  1. GPS battery life40 h vs 65 h+62%
  2. Weight89.2 g vs 76 g+17%
  3. Thickness14.3 mm vs 12.5 mm+14%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)50 h vs 55 h+10%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare