NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED Tactical Edition

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED Tactical Edition

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (6) and where Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED Tactical Edition wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
6 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED Tactical Edition
7.5Score
1 advantage≈ $500
8.7Display5.6
8.2Battery life7.3
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.8
9.0Build & durability5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarInstinct 3 50mm AMOLED Tactical Edition
51.4 × 51.414.550 × 5014.4
T-Rex Dual SolarInstinct 3 50mm AMOLED Tactical EditionDifference
Height51.4 mm50 mm+1.4 mm
Width51.4 mm50 mm+1.4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm14.4 mm+0.1 mm
Weight69 g59 g+10 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED Tactical Edition?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 24 days+4%
  2. Sapphire crystalYes · Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED Tactical Edition: No
  3. Sport profiles180 vs 97+86%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)41 h vs 30 h+37%
  5. Resolution (width)466 px vs 416 px+12%
  6. Pixel density353 ppi vs 320 ppi+10%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED Tactical Edition better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Weight69 g vs 59 g+17%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare