NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Dual Solar vs Race 2

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar vs Suunto Race 2

What T-Rex Dual Solar does better (4) and where Race 2 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Dual Solar
Amazfit · 2026T-Rex Dual Solar
9.4Score
4 advantages≈ $650
Higher score
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
3 advantages≈ $510
8.7Display6.3
8.2Battery life8.0
9.6Health tracking4.9
9.5Sports & outdoor6.4
9.0Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex Dual SolarRace 2
51.4 × 51.414.549 × 4912.5
T-Rex Dual SolarRace 2Difference
Height51.4 mm49 mm+2.4 mm
Width51.4 mm49 mm+2.4 mm
Thickness14.5 mm12.5 mm+2 mm
Weight69 g76 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Dual Solar better than Race 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)25 days vs 18 days+39%
  2. Sport profiles180 vs 95+89%
  3. Weight69 g vs 76 g+10%
  4. Pixel density353 ppi vs 311 ppi+14%

Why is Race 2 better than T-Rex Dual Solar?

  1. Screen size1.32″ vs 1.5″+14%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)41 h vs 55 h+34%
  3. Thickness14.5 mm vs 12.5 mm+16%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare