NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra vs Instinct 2X Solar

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra vs Garmin Instinct 2X Solar

What T-Rex Ultra does better (5) and where Instinct 2X Solar wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra
Amazfit · 2023T-Rex Ultra
8.3Score
5 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct 2X Solar
Garmin · 2022Instinct 2X Solar
6.6Score
5 advantages≈ $450
8.0Display4.0
7.2Battery life8.7
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.0Sports & outdoor5.5
6.3Build & durability5.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex UltraInstinct 2X Solar
47.3 × 47.313.450 × 5014.5
T-Rex UltraInstinct 2X SolarDifference
Height47.3 mm50 mm−2.7 mm
Width47.3 mm50 mm−2.7 mm
Thickness13.4 mm14.5 mm−1.1 mm
Weight89 g67 g+22 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra better than Instinct 2X Solar?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct 2X Solar: No
  2. Resolution (width)454 px vs 176 px2.6×
  3. Pixel density326 ppi vs 113 ppi2.9×
  4. Thickness13.4 mm vs 14.5 mm+8%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)28 h vs 27 h+4%

Why is Instinct 2X Solar better than T-Rex Ultra?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 40 days2×
  2. GPS battery life46 h vs 60 h+30%
  3. Battery saver mode25 days vs 100 days4×
  4. Weight89 g vs 67 g+33%
  5. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.56″+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare