NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra vs Race 2

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra vs Suunto Race 2

What T-Rex Ultra does better (2) and where Race 2 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra
Amazfit · 2023T-Rex Ultra
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ $400
vs
Suunto Race 2
Suunto · 2025Race 2
9.0Score
6 advantages≈ $510
Higher score
8.0Display6.3
7.2Battery life8.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.0Sports & outdoor6.4
6.3Build & durability8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex UltraRace 2
47.3 × 47.313.449 × 4912.5
T-Rex UltraRace 2Difference
Height47.3 mm49 mm−1.7 mm
Width47.3 mm49 mm−1.7 mm
Thickness13.4 mm12.5 mm+0.9 mm
Weight89 g76 g+13 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra better than Race 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 18 days+11%
  2. Pixel density326 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%

Why is Race 2 better than T-Rex Ultra?

  1. GPS battery life46 h vs 65 h+41%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)28 h vs 55 h+96%
  3. Weight89 g vs 76 g+17%
  4. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.5″+8%
  5. Thickness13.4 mm vs 12.5 mm+8%
  6. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare