NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. T-Rex Ultra vs Vertical 2

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra vs Suunto Vertical 2

What T-Rex Ultra does better (1) and where Vertical 2 wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Amazfit T-Rex Ultra
Amazfit · 2023T-Rex Ultra
8.3Score
1 advantage≈ $400
vs
Suunto Vertical 2
Suunto · 2025Vertical 2
9.3Score
6 advantages≈ $640
Higher score
8.0Display6.3
7.2Battery life8.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
6.0Sports & outdoor6.4
6.3Build & durability7.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

T-Rex UltraVertical 2
47.3 × 47.313.449 × 4913.6
T-Rex UltraVertical 2Difference
Height47.3 mm49 mm−1.7 mm
Width47.3 mm49 mm−1.7 mm
Thickness13.4 mm13.6 mm−0.2 mm
Weight89 g87 g+2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is T-Rex Ultra better than Vertical 2?

  1. Pixel density326 ppi vs 311 ppi+5%

Why is Vertical 2 better than T-Rex Ultra?

  1. GPS battery life46 h vs 75 h+63%
  2. GPS battery life (dual-band)28 h vs 65 h2.3×
  3. Screen size1.39″ vs 1.5″+8%
  4. Weight89 g vs 87 g+2%
  5. Battery capacity500 mAh vs 620 mAh+24%
  6. Resolution (width)454 px vs 466 px+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare