NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Watch SE 3 vs GT3

Apple Watch SE 3 vs Cubot GT3

What Watch SE 3 does better (5) and where GT3 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Apple Watch SE 3
Apple · 2025Watch SE 3
5.9Score
5 advantages≈ $240
vs
Cubot GT3
Cubot · 2025GT3
6.5Score
2 advantages
Higher score
6.6Display9.8
9.5Health tracking5.0
8.0Sports & outdoor4.7
7.6Smart features3.9
9.0Build & durability3.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Watch SE 3GT3
38 × 4410.748.2 × 59.313.4
Watch SE 3GT3Difference
Height44 mm59.3 mm−15.3 mm
Width38 mm48.2 mm−10.2 mm
Thickness10.7 mm13.4 mm−2.7 mm
Weight26 g57 g−31 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Watch SE 3 better than GT3?

  1. Weight26.4 g vs 57 g2.2×
  2. NFC paymentsYes · GT3: No
  3. LTE (cellular)Yes · GT3: No
  4. eSIMYes · GT3: No
  5. Thickness10.7 mm vs 13.4 mm+25%

Why is GT3 better than Watch SE 3?

  1. Screen size1.78″ vs 1.96″+10%
  2. Resolution (width)368 px vs 410 px+11%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare