vs
5.0Display5.5
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05 better than SWC-338?
VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is SWC-338 better than VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05?
- Screen size0.96″ vs 1.38″+44%
- Battery capacity140 mAh vs 210 mAh+50%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Kunststoff |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | — |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 0.96″ | 1.38″ |
| Display technology | OLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | OLED | Farbdisplay |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 240 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 140 mAh | 210 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Charging | magnetische Ladeschale, über USB Port | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Proprietär |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Fitbit Charge 6vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C055.66.6
vsHaylou RS4 PlusvsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05
vsMaxcom Fit FW42vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05
vsXiaomi Smart Band 9 ActivevsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C055.56.6vs
Asus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05vsXiaomi Smart Band 86.66.4
vsDenver SWC-338vsXiaomi Smart Band 87.16.4