vs
5.0Display3.5
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05 better than Smart Band 9 Active?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Smart Band 9 Active: No
Why is Smart Band 9 Active better than VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)3 days vs 18 days6×
- Screen size0.96″ vs 1.47″+53%
- Battery capacity140 mAh vs 300 mAh2.1×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Weight | — | 16.5 g |
| Thickness | — | 10 mm |
| Case material | — | Plastic / polymer |
| Lens / cover glass | — | 2.5D-Glas |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 5 ATM | 50 m / 5 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 0.96″ | 1.47″ |
| Display technology | OLED | LCD |
| Panel | OLED | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | — | 320 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 172 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 3 days | 18 days |
| Battery capacity | 140 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Charging | magnetische Ladeschale, über USB Port | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | Android, iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Fitbit Charge 6vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C055.66.6
vsDenver SWC-338vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C057.16.6
vsHaylou RS4 PlusvsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05
vsMaxcom Fit FW42vsAsus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05vs
Asus VivoWatch 5 Aero HC-C05vsXiaomi Smart Band 86.66.4
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 11 ActivevsXiaomi Smart Band 9 Active5.45.5