vs
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.1Build & durability3.9
Dimensions
Size comparison
VivoWatch 5 HC-B05Watch 4 Pro
| VivoWatch 5 HC-B05 | Watch 4 Pro | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 53.5 mm | 46.4 mm | +7.1 mm |
| Thickness | 13.5 mm | 11.4 mm | +2.1 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 50 g | +24 g |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is VivoWatch 5 HC-B05 better than Watch 4 Pro?
VivoWatch 5 HC-B05 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Watch 4 Pro better than VivoWatch 5 HC-B05?
- Weight74 g vs 50 g+48%
- Thickness13.5 mm vs 11.4 mm+18%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 54 mm | 46 mm |
| Weight | 74 g | 50 g |
| Thickness | 13.5 mm | 11.4 mm |
| Height | — | 46.4 mm |
| Width | — | 46.4 mm |
| Case material | — | Stainless steel |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| Colours | — | Black, Silver, Gold |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.5″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | — | LTPO AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 464 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 464 px |
| Pixel density | — | 310 ppi |
| LTPO display | — | Yes |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 10 days | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 480 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Po |
| Wireless charging | — | Yes |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | — | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, barometer, compass, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | Yes |
| LTE (cellular) | — | Yes |
| eSIM | — | Yes |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | MagicOS 7.2 |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
