vs
3.3Display5.6
5.5Health tracking5.5
Why is 9720 better than Moto Watch Fit?
9720 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Moto Watch Fit better than 9720?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · 9720: Yes
- Screen size1.45″ vs 1.9″+31%
- Battery capacity140 mAh vs 300 mAh2.1×
- Weight28 g vs 25 g+12%
- Thickness11 mm vs 9.5 mm+16%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 44 mm |
| Weight | 28 g | 25 g |
| Thickness | 11 mm | 9.5 mm |
| Height | — | 44.5 mm |
| Width | — | 38 mm |
| Case material | Aluminium | Aluminium |
| Lens / cover glass | — | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Strap material | Silikon | Textil, Nylon |
| Water resistance | — | 5 ATM |
| Ingress protection | — | IP68 |
| Water resistance (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM |
| Colours | Silver | Trekking Green |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.45″ | 1.9″ |
| Display technology | — | OLED |
| Panel | Farbdisplay | OLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Always-on display | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 348 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 442 px |
| Pixel density | — | 296 ppi |
| Peak brightness | — | 1,000 nits |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 140 mAh | 300 mAh |
| Battery type | Li-Po | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2 | Accelerometer, gyro, heart rate, PPG |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | No |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | RTOS |
| Platform | — | Proprietary |
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android |
