Bea-Fon Watch 101 vs S&T Design Fitness Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
What Watch 101 does better (0) and where Fitness Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren wins (1) — every spec side by side.
vs
8.9Display9.4
Why is Watch 101 better than Fitness Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren?
Watch 101 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Fitness Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren better than Watch 101?
- Screen size1.8″ vs 1.85″+3%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 46 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Colours | Black | Silver |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.8″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 7 days | — |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Compass | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS |
Related comparisons
vs
Bea-Fon Watch 101vsFitbit PSMART PRO Mini Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED9.49.2
vsKodak SW-7204 SmartwatchvsBea-Fon Watch 101
vsAmazfit Helio CorevsBea-Fon Watch 101
vsIce Watch Fit 1.0vsBea-Fon Watch 1019.39.4
vs
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 ProvsS&T Design Fitness Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren
vsIce Watch Ice Fit RT 3.0vsS&T Design Fitness Smartwatch 1,85" AMOLED-Display, Metall, Herren