Bea-Fon Watch 102 vs Kospet Pulse

What Watch 102 does better (0) and where Pulse wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Bea-Fon · 2025Watch 102

9.5Score

0 advantages≈ $35

Kospet · 2025Pulse

9.6Score

2 advantages≈ $50

Higher score

9.1Display9.7

5.5Health tracking4.9

Why is Watch 102 better than Pulse?

Watch 102 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Only differences	Bea-Fon Watch 102≈ $359.5	Kospet Pulse≈ $509.6
Design & durability
Lens / cover glass	—	Gorilla Glas
Strap material	Silikon	Silikon
Colours	Black	—
Display
Screen size	1.83″	1.96″
Display technology	AMOLED	AMOLED
Panel	AMOLED	AMOLED
AMOLED / OLED display	Yes	Yes
Resolution (width)	—	410 px
Resolution (height)	—	502 px
Battery
Battery life (smartwatch mode)	4 days	—
Battery capacity	250 mAh	350 mAh
Health sensors
Optical heart rate	Yes	Yes
Blood oxygen (SpO2)	Yes	Yes
Sleep tracking	—	Yes
Sensors	heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer	heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer
Sports & navigation
Built-in GPS	Yes	—
Satellite systems	GPS	—
Connectivity
Bluetooth	5.3	5.3
Platform
Works with	—	iOS, Android