vs
9.4Display3.3
Why is Watch 201 better than 105 (2023)?
- Built-in GPSYes · 105 (2023): No
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 105 (2023): No
- Resolution (width)390 px vs 120 px3.2×
- Screen size1.85″ vs 1.8″+3%
Why is 105 (2023) better than Watch 201?
105 (2023) has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | — | 78.7 g |
| Thickness | — | 14.5 mm |
| Height | — | 115.1 mm |
| Width | — | 49.4 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Colours | — | Red Terracotta, Cyan, Charcoal |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.85″ | 1.8″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | TFT LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Resolution (width) | 390 px | 120 px |
| Resolution (height) | 450 px | 160 px |
| Pixel density | — | 111 ppi |
| Refresh rate | — | 60 Hz |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 8 days | — |
| Battery capacity | — | 1,000 mAh |
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | No |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| NFC payments | — | No |
| LTE (cellular) | — | No |
| eSIM | — | No |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Voice assistant | Yes | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | Android | — |
