Why is Watch 601 better than PSW 300?
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 240 mAh+25%
- Thickness12 mm vs 13 mm+8%
Why is PSW 300 better than Watch 601?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.85″+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 41 mm |
| Thickness | 12 mm | 13 mm |
| Strap material | Kautschuk | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 240 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Dive mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsBlackview W70 Pro
vsReflex Active Series 54 SmartwatchvsBea-Fon Watch 601vs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60gvs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsColmi V899.19.1vs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsBea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsReflex Active Series 40 AMOLED Smartwatch