Why is Watch 601 better than Ares 3?
- Resolution (width)466 px vs 240 px+94%
- Thickness12 mm vs 12.7 mm+6%
Why is Ares 3 better than Watch 601?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.75″+22%
- Battery capacity300 mAh vs 380 mAh+27%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Thickness | 12 mm | 12.7 mm |
| Strap material | Kautschuk | Silikon |
| Water resistance | — | 3 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | — | 30 m / 3 bar / 3 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.75″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | 240 px |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | 296 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | 300 mAh | 380 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Dive mode | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | — | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsBlackview W70 Pro
vs
Reflex Active Series 54 SmartwatchvsBea-Fon Watch 601
vs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g
vs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsColmi V899.19.1
vs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsBea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLED
vs
Bea-Fon Watch 601vsReflex Active Series 40 AMOLED Smartwatch

