Dimensions
Size comparison
W90 ProSWC-176
| W90 Pro | SWC-176 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 48.6 mm | 46 mm | +2.6 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is W90 Pro better than SWC-176?
- AMOLED / OLED displayYes · SWC-176: No
- Battery capacity900 mAh vs 200 mAh4.5×
Why is SWC-176 better than W90 Pro?
SWC-176 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 49 mm | 46 mm |
| Thickness | 14.4 mm | — |
| Case material | Stainless steel | Aluminium |
| Strap material | Edelstahl | Silikon |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.81″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | LCD |
| Panel | AMOLED | LCD |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | No |
| Touchscreen | Yes | — |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | 900 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate, barometer | heart rate |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| LED flashlight | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Microphone | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Android Wear | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Blackview W90 ProvsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch
vsDenver SWC-184RO Smartwatch 1,8" IPS Full-TouchvsBlackview W90 Pro
vsLogiLink EdgevsBlackview W90 Provs
Blackview W90 ProvsRadley Series 33 AMOLED Smartwatch
vsDenver SWC-176vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch
vsDenver SWC-195vsDenver SWC-1769.14.6