vs
9.0Display6.2
Why is BW-AT5 Smartwatch better than FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g?
- Battery capacity400 mAh vs 200 mAh2×
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.32″+8%
Why is FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g better than BW-AT5 Smartwatch?
FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60g has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 390 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 390 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | 200 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | — |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sensors | SpO2 | SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
BlitzWolf BW-AT5 SmartwatchvsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch
vsBea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvsBlitzWolf BW-AT5 Smartwatch
vsBea-Fon Watch 601vsBlitzWolf BW-AT5 Smartwatch9.09.0
vsNewgen Medicals Fitness-Smartwatch Herzfrequenz, Blutdruck & ChatGPTvsBlitzWolf BW-AT5 Smartwatch
vs
Motorola Moto Watch 2vsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60gvsMaxcom FW48 Smartwatch 1,32" AMOLED Touchscreen 60gvsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch