vs
9.0Display6.7
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is BW-AT5 Smartwatch better than PSW 200?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.32″+8%
Why is PSW 200 better than BW-AT5 Smartwatch?
PSW 200 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 44 mm |
| Thickness | — | 9 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
Bea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvsBlitzWolf BW-AT5 Smartwatchvs
BlitzWolf BW-AT5 SmartwatchvsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch
vsBea-Fon Watch 601vsBlitzWolf BW-AT5 Smartwatch8.98.9
vsNewgen Medicals Fitness-Smartwatch Herzfrequenz, Blutdruck & ChatGPTvsBlitzWolf BW-AT5 Smartwatchvs
Bea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvsPeaq PSW 200vsPeaq PSW 200vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch