vs
9.0Display9.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
Why is BW-AT5 Smartwatch better than PSW 300?
- Battery capacity400 mAh vs 240 mAh+67%
Why is PSW 300 better than BW-AT5 Smartwatch?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.85″+29%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | — | 41 mm |
| Thickness | — | 13 mm |
| Strap material | Silikon | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 400 mAh | 240 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | SpO2 | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | — |
| Satellite systems | GPS | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | — |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | — |
Related comparisons
vs
BlitzWolf BW-AT5 SmartwatchvsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watch
vsBea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvsBlitzWolf BW-AT5 Smartwatch
vsBea-Fon Watch 601vsBlitzWolf BW-AT5 Smartwatch9.09.0
vsNewgen Medicals Fitness-Smartwatch Herzfrequenz, Blutdruck & ChatGPTvsBlitzWolf BW-AT5 Smartwatch
vsPeaq PSW 300vsPeers Hardy Series 29 AMOLED Smart Calling Watchvs
Peaq PSW 300vsPeers Hardy Series 54 AMOLED9.69.6