vs
9.8Build & durability9.3
Why is G-Squad GBD-H2000 better than Tank M4?
- Water resistance20 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
Why is Tank M4 better than G-Squad GBD-H2000?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · G-Squad GBD-H2000: Yes
- Weight63 g vs 60 g+5%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 53 mm | — |
| Weight | 63 g | 60 g |
| Thickness | 19.4 mm | — |
| Height | 59.6 mm | — |
| Width | 52.6 mm | — |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | — |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | Gorilla Glas |
| Strap material | Kunststoff | — |
| Water resistance | 20 ATM | 10 ATM |
| Water rating (maker) | 200 m / 20 bar / 20 ATM | 100 m / 10 bar / 10 ATM |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.96″ |
| Display technology | — | AMOLED |
| Panel | Mirasol | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 410 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 502 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 10 days |
| Battery type | Li-Ion | — |
| Charging | über USB Port, Solar-Ladefunktion | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| ECG | — | Yes |
| Skin temperature | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate, temperature, barometer, accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2 |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | Yes | Yes |
| Satellite systems | GPS | GPS |
| Barometric altimeter | Yes | — |
| Compass | Yes | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3 |
| Platform | ||
| Works with | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Suunto RacevsCasio G-Squad GBD-H20008.69.7
vsAmazfit T-Rex 3 ProvsCasio G-Squad GBD-H20009.69.7
vsAmazfit T-Rex UltravsCasio G-Squad GBD-H20008.39.7
vsAmazfit FalconvsCasio G-Squad GBD-H20009.69.7
vs
Kospet Tank T4vsKospet Tank M49.49.7
vsTimex Expedition North Tide-Temp-Compass Analoguhr HerrenvsKospet Tank M4