NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. GBD-300 vs 9000

Casio GBD-300 vs Hama 9000

What GBD-300 does better (1) and where 9000 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Casio GBD-300
Casio · 2024GBD-300
1 advantage≈ $120
vs
Hama 9000
Hama · 20259000
9.1Score
2 advantages≈ $120
Higher score
Dimensions

Size comparison

GBD-3009000
49 × 4914.947 × 4714
GBD-3009000Difference
Case size49 mm47 mm+2 mm
Thickness14.9 mm14 mm+0.9 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is GBD-300 better than 9000?

  1. Water resistance20 ATM vs 5 ATM4×

Why is 9000 better than GBD-300?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · GBD-300: Yes
  2. Thickness14.9 mm vs 14 mm+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare