vs
Dimensions
Size comparison
GBD-300Ticwatch Pro 3
| GBD-300 | Ticwatch Pro 3 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 49 mm | 48 mm | +1 mm |
| Thickness | 14.9 mm | 12.2 mm | +2.7 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is GBD-300 better than Ticwatch Pro 3?
GBD-300 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Ticwatch Pro 3 better than GBD-300?
- AMOLED / OLED displayNo · GBD-300: Yes
- Thickness14.9 mm vs 12.2 mm+22%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 49 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 41.9 g |
| Thickness | 14.9 mm | 12.2 mm |
| Height | — | 47 mm |
| Width | — | 48 mm |
| Case material | Plastic / polymer | Stainless steel |
| Lens / cover glass | Mineralglas Mineralglas | — |
| Strap material | Kunststoff, Resin | Silikon |
| Water resistance | 20 ATM | — |
| Water rating (maker) | 200 m / 20 bar / 20 ATM | — |
| Colours | — | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | — | 1.4″ |
| Display technology | LCD | AMOLED |
| Panel | LED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | — | 454 px |
| Resolution (height) | — | 454 px |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | — | 3 days |
| Battery capacity | — | 595 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | — | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | — | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | accelerometer | heart rate, SpO2, barometer, accelerometer, ambient light |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Barometric altimeter | — | Yes |
| Multisport / triathlon mode | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | 4 | — |
| Smart features | ||
| Speaker | — | Yes |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | — | Wear OS by Google |
| Platform | — | Wear OS |
| Chipset | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 4100 |
