vs
3.2Display4.7
Why is BTIONWATCHPRORK better than Active Series 17 RA17-2164-TWS?
BTIONWATCHPRORK has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is Active Series 17 RA17-2164-TWS better than BTIONWATCHPRORK?
- Screen size1.38″ vs 1.83″+33%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 35 mm | — |
| Weight | — | 35 g |
| Thickness | 34 mm | — |
| Strap material | Silikon | — |
| Ingress protection | IP65 | — |
| Water resistance (IPx) | IPx5 | — |
| Colours | Black | Black |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.38″ | 1.83″ |
| Display technology | LCD | LCD |
| Panel | TFT | TFT |
| AMOLED / OLED display | No | No |
| Battery | ||
| Battery type | — | Li-Ion |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | — |
| Sleep tracking | Yes | — |
| Sensors | heart rate | — |
| Sports & navigation | ||
| Built-in GPS | — | Yes |
| Satellite systems | — | GPS |
| Connectivity | ||
| Bluetooth | — | 2 |
| Platform | ||
| Operating system | Proprietär | — |
| Platform | Proprietary | — |
| Works with | iOS, Android | Android |
Related comparisons
vs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsColmi V75
vs
Bea-Fon Legion 3 Smartwatch 1,95" AMOLEDvsCellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORK
vs
Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPRORKvsRadley RYS08-2088
vs
Reflex Active Series 17 RA17-2164-TWSvsColmi V75
vs
Bea-Fon 401 RoundvsReflex Active Series 17 RA17-2164-TWS
vs
Reflex Active Series 17 RA17-2164-TWSvsPeaq PSW 100
