Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPROSK vs Zeblaze Stratos 4

What BTIONWATCHPROSK does better (0) and where Stratos 4 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Cellular Line · 2025BTIONWATCHPROSK

3.7Score

0 advantages≈ $50

Zeblaze · 2025Stratos 4

5.9Score

3 advantages≈ $70

Higher score

2.1Display8.2

4.9Health tracking4.9

Dimensions

Size comparison

BTIONWATCHPROSKStratos 4

	BTIONWATCHPROSK	Stratos 4	Difference
Case size	46 mm	46.3 mm	−0.3 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

BTIONWATCHPROSK has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Only differences	Cellular Line BTIONWATCHPROSK≈ $503.7	Zeblaze Stratos 4≈ $705.9
Design & durability
Case size	46 mm	49 mm
Weight	—	60 g
Thickness	—	14 mm
Height	—	46.3 mm
Width	—	46.3 mm
Case material	Plastic / polymer	Plastic / polymer
Lens / cover glass	—	Gorilla Glas
Strap material	Kunststoff	Silikon
Water resistance	—	5 ATM
Water rating (maker)	—	50 m / 5 bar / 5 ATM
Colours	Black	Black
Display
Screen size	1″	1.43″
Display technology	LCD	AMOLED
Panel	TFT	AMOLED
AMOLED / OLED display	No	Yes
Touchscreen	—	Yes
Resolution (width)	—	466 px
Resolution (height)	—	466 px
Battery
Battery life (smartwatch mode)	—	18 days
Battery capacity	260 mAh	500 mAh
Battery type	Li-Po	—
Health sensors
Optical heart rate	Yes	Yes
Blood oxygen (SpO2)	Yes	Yes
ECG	—	Yes
Sleep tracking	Yes	Yes
Sensors	heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer	heart rate, SpO2, accelerometer
Sports & navigation
Built-in GPS	—	Yes
Satellite systems	—	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Connectivity
Bluetooth	4	5.3
Platform
Operating system	Proprietär	—
Platform	Proprietary	—
Works with	iOS, Android	iOS, Android