Dimensions
Size comparison
V89PSW 200
| V89 | PSW 200 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 43 mm | 44 mm | −1 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V89 better than PSW 200?
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.32″+8%
Why is PSW 200 better than V89?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)4 days vs 12 days3×
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 43 mm | 44 mm |
| Thickness | — | 9 mm |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.32″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 4 days | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | — |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
