Dimensions
Size comparison
V89PSW 300
| V89 | PSW 300 | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case size | 43 mm | 41 mm | +2 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is V89 better than PSW 300?
V89 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is PSW 300 better than V89?
- Battery life (smartwatch mode)4 days vs 12 days3×
- Screen size1.43″ vs 1.85″+29%
- Battery capacity200 mAh vs 240 mAh+20%
Specifications
Side by side
| Design & durability | ||
| Case size | 43 mm | 41 mm |
| Thickness | — | 13 mm |
| Strap material | — | Silikon |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 1.43″ | 1.85″ |
| Display technology | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Panel | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| AMOLED / OLED display | Yes | Yes |
| Resolution (width) | 466 px | — |
| Resolution (height) | 466 px | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery life (smartwatch mode) | 4 days | 12 days |
| Battery capacity | 200 mAh | 240 mAh |
| Health sensors | ||
| Optical heart rate | Yes | Yes |
| Blood oxygen (SpO2) | Yes | Yes |
| Sleep tracking | — | Yes |
| Sensors | heart rate | heart rate, SpO2 |
