NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Apex 4 (42mm) vs Forerunner 265S

Coros Apex 4 (42mm) vs Garmin Forerunner 265S

What Apex 4 (42mm) does better (5) and where Forerunner 265S wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Coros Apex 4 (42mm)
Coros · 2025Apex 4 (42mm)
5.0Score
5 advantages≈ $430
vs
Garmin Forerunner 265S
Garmin · 2023Forerunner 265S
5.2Score
6 advantages≈ $450
Higher score
3.4Display5.0
5.4Battery life3.9
4.9Health tracking4.9
4.6Sports & outdoor5.0
6.5Smart features6.5
4.8Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Apex 4 (42mm)Forerunner 265S
42.6 × 42.61441.7 × 41.712.9
Apex 4 (42mm)Forerunner 265SDifference
Height42.6 mm41.7 mm+0.9 mm
Width42.6 mm41.7 mm+0.9 mm
Thickness14 mm12.9 mm+1.1 mm
Weight56 g39 g+17 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Apex 4 (42mm) better than Forerunner 265S?

  1. GPS battery life34 h vs 24 h+42%
  2. Storage32 GB vs 8 GB4×
  3. Sapphire crystalYes · Forerunner 265S: No
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.1″+9%
  5. GPS battery life (dual-band)26 h vs 15 h+73%

Why is Forerunner 265S better than Apex 4 (42mm)?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Apex 4 (42mm): Yes
  2. Weight56 g vs 39 g+44%
  3. Pixel density200 ppi vs 327 ppi+64%
  4. Sport profiles36 vs 58+61%
  5. Resolution (width)240 px vs 360 px+50%
  6. Thickness14 mm vs 12.9 mm+9%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare