NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Apex 4 (42mm) vs Grit X2

Coros Apex 4 (42mm) vs Polar Grit X2

What Apex 4 (42mm) does better (3) and where Grit X2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Coros Apex 4 (42mm)
Coros · 2025Apex 4 (42mm)
5.0Score
3 advantages≈ $430
Higher score
vs
Polar Grit X2
Polar · 2025Grit X2
4.4Score
5 advantages≈ $520
3.4Display6.4
5.4Battery life3.0
4.9Health tracking8.3
4.6Sports & outdoor2.9
4.8Build & durability4.0
Dimensions

Size comparison

Apex 4 (42mm)Grit X2
42.6 × 42.61444.7 × 44.712.5
Apex 4 (42mm)Grit X2Difference
Height42.6 mm44.7 mm−2.1 mm
Width42.6 mm44.7 mm−2.1 mm
Thickness14 mm12.5 mm+1.5 mm
Weight56 g62 g−6 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Apex 4 (42mm) better than Grit X2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 8 days+88%
  2. GPS battery life34 h vs 25 h+36%
  3. Weight56 g vs 62 g+11%

Why is Grit X2 better than Apex 4 (42mm)?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Apex 4 (42mm): Yes
  2. Resolution (width)240 px vs 416 px+73%
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.28″+7%
  4. Pixel density200 ppi vs 325 ppi+62%
  5. Thickness14 mm vs 12.5 mm+12%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare