NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Nomad vs Run 2

Coros Nomad vs Suunto Run 2

What Nomad does better (5) and where Run 2 wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Coros Nomad
Coros · 2025Nomad
5.3Score
5 advantages≈ $350
vs
Suunto Run 2
Suunto · 2026Run 2
5.4Score
5 advantages≈ $320
Higher score
3.8Display7.1
7.9Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
5.2Sports & outdoor4.5
2.3Build & durability4.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

NomadRun 2
47.8 × 47.814.846.5 × 46.511.7
NomadRun 2Difference
Height47.8 mm46.5 mm+1.3 mm
Width47.8 mm46.5 mm+1.3 mm
Thickness14.8 mm11.7 mm+3.1 mm
Weight61 g53 g+8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Nomad better than Run 2?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)22 days vs 12 days+83%
  2. GPS battery life50 h vs 30 h+67%
  3. Wi-FiWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 14×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)34 h vs 24 h+42%
  5. Sport profiles43 vs 32+34%

Why is Run 2 better than Nomad?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Nomad: Yes
  2. Weight61 g vs 53 g+15%
  3. Resolution (width)260 px vs 466 px+79%
  4. Pixel density200 ppi vs 353 ppi+76%
  5. Thickness14.8 mm vs 11.7 mm+26%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare