NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 3 vs Forerunner 165

Coros Pace 3 vs Garmin Forerunner 165

What Pace 3 does better (3) and where Forerunner 165 wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 3
Coros · 2023Pace 3
4.2Score
3 advantages≈ $200
vs
Garmin Forerunner 165
Garmin · 2024Forerunner 165
4.3Score
3 advantages≈ $250
Higher score
3.4Display5.3
5.3Battery life3.1
4.9Health tracking4.9
2.3Sports & outdoor2.7
3.5Build & durability3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 3Forerunner 165
41.9 × 41.911.743 × 4311.6
Pace 3Forerunner 165Difference
Height41.9 mm43 mm−1.1 mm
Width41.9 mm43 mm−1.1 mm
Thickness11.7 mm11.6 mm+0.1 mm
Weight39 g39 g=

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 3 better than Forerunner 165?

  1. GPS battery life38 h vs 19 h2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 11 days+36%
  3. Sport profiles28 vs 25+12%

Why is Forerunner 165 better than Pace 3?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayNo · Pace 3: Yes
  2. Resolution (width)240 px vs 390 px+62%
  3. Pixel density200 ppi vs 325 ppi+62%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare