NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 3 vs Pacer

Coros Pace 3 vs Polar Pacer

What Pace 3 does better (6) and where Pacer wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 3
Coros · 2023Pace 3
4.2Score
6 advantages≈ $200
Higher score
vs
Polar Pacer
Polar · 2022Pacer
3.7Score
0 advantages≈ $260
3.4Display2.3
5.3Battery life3.5
4.9Health tracking2.1
2.3Sports & outdoor2.0
3.5Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 3Pacer
41.9 × 41.911.745 × 4511.5
Pace 3PacerDifference
Height41.9 mm45 mm−3.1 mm
Width41.9 mm45 mm−3.1 mm
Thickness11.7 mm11.5 mm+0.2 mm
Weight39 g40 g−1 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 3 better than Pacer?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)15 days vs 6.5 days2.3×
  2. GPS battery life38 h vs 32 h+19%
  3. TouchscreenYes · Pacer: No
  4. Barometric altimeterYes · Pacer: No
  5. CompassYes · Pacer: No
  6. Weight39 g vs 40 g+3%

Why is Pacer better than Pace 3?

Pacer has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare