NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Aluminum vs Pace Pro

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum vs Coros Pace Pro

What Pace 4 Aluminum does better (3) and where Pace Pro wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum
Coros · 2025Pace 4 Aluminum
6.1Score
3 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ $300
5.3Display5.0
7.1Battery life7.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor3.8
3.1Build & durability2.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 AluminumPace Pro
43.4 × 43.411.846 × 4612.2
Pace 4 AluminumPace ProDifference
Height43.4 mm46 mm−2.6 mm
Width43.4 mm46 mm−2.6 mm
Thickness11.8 mm12.2 mm−0.4 mm
Weight41 g49 g−8 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Aluminum better than Pace Pro?

  1. GPS battery life41 h vs 38 h+8%
  2. Weight41 g vs 49 g+20%
  3. Thickness11.8 mm vs 12.2 mm+4%

Why is Pace Pro better than Pace 4 Aluminum?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)19 days vs 20 days+5%
  2. Storage4 GB vs 32 GB8×
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  4. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare