NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs 9 Peak Pro

Coros Pace Pro vs Suunto 9 Peak Pro

What Pace Pro does better (6) and where 9 Peak Pro wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
6 advantages≈ $300
vs
Suunto 9 Peak Pro
Suunto · 20229 Peak Pro
6.1Score
6 advantages≈ $210
Higher score
5.0Display3.4
7.0Battery life7.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor2.4
2.7Build & durability9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace Pro9 Peak Pro
46 × 4612.243 × 4310.3
Pace Pro9 Peak ProDifference
Height46 mm43 mm+3 mm
Width46 mm43 mm+3 mm
Thickness12.2 mm10.3 mm+1.9 mm
Weight49 g64 g−15 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than 9 Peak Pro?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 9 Peak Pro: No
  2. Dual-band GPSYes · 9 Peak Pro: No
  3. Weight49 g vs 64 g+31%
  4. Screen size1.3″ vs 1.2″+8%
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 240 px+73%
  6. Pixel density320 ppi vs 200 ppi+60%

Why is 9 Peak Pro better than Pace Pro?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 21 days+5%
  3. Sport profiles28 vs 953.4×
  4. GPS battery life38 h vs 40 h+5%
  5. Sapphire crystalNo · Pace Pro: Yes
  6. Thickness12.2 mm vs 10.3 mm+19%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare