NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace Pro vs Race S

Coros Pace Pro vs Suunto Race S

What Pace Pro does better (4) and where Race S wins (7) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace Pro
5.9Score
4 advantages≈ $300
vs
Suunto Race S
Suunto · 2024Race S
6.1Score
7 advantages≈ $300
Higher score
5.0Display4.8
7.0Battery life4.6
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor6.4
2.7Build & durability9.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace ProRace S
46 × 4612.245 × 4511.4
Pace ProRace SDifference
Height46 mm45 mm+1 mm
Width46 mm45 mm+1 mm
Thickness12.2 mm11.4 mm+0.8 mm
Weight49 g53 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace Pro better than Race S?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)20 days vs 9 days2.2×
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Race S: No
  3. Weight49 g vs 53 g+8%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 30 h+3%

Why is Race S better than Pace Pro?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Sport profiles28 vs 953.4×
  3. GPS battery life38 h vs 40 h+5%
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Pace Pro: Yes
  5. Resolution (width)416 px vs 466 px+12%
  6. Pixel density320 ppi vs 353 ppi+10%
  7. Thickness12.2 mm vs 11.4 mm+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare