NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Aluminum vs Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum vs Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED

What Pace 4 Aluminum does better (4) and where Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum
Coros · 2025Pace 4 Aluminum
6.1Score
4 advantages≈ $280
vs
Garmin Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED
7.5Score
6 advantages≈ $400
Higher score
5.3Display5.6
7.1Battery life7.3
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor6.6
3.1Build & durability5.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 AluminumInstinct 3 50mm AMOLED
43.4 × 43.411.850 × 5014.4
Pace 4 AluminumInstinct 3 50mm AMOLEDDifference
Height43.4 mm50 mm−6.6 mm
Width43.4 mm50 mm−6.6 mm
Thickness11.8 mm14.4 mm−2.6 mm
Weight41 g59 g−18 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Aluminum better than Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED?

  1. Weight41 g vs 59 g+44%
  2. GPS battery life41 h vs 40 h+2%
  3. Thickness11.8 mm vs 14.4 mm+22%
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 30 h+3%

Why is Instinct 3 50mm AMOLED better than Pace 4 Aluminum?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)19 days vs 24 days+26%
  2. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  3. Sport profiles28 vs 963.4×
  4. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.3″+8%
  5. Battery life with always-on display6 days vs 9 days+50%
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare