NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Aluminum vs Instinct E 45mm

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum vs Garmin Instinct E 45mm

What Pace 4 Aluminum does better (8) and where Instinct E 45mm wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum
Coros · 2025Pace 4 Aluminum
6.1Score
8 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Garmin Instinct E 45mm
Garmin · 2025Instinct E 45mm
4.6Score
3 advantages≈ $250
5.3Display2.6
7.1Battery life5.0
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor4.5
3.1Build & durability5.8
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 AluminumInstinct E 45mm
43.4 × 43.411.845 × 4514.2
Pace 4 AluminumInstinct E 45mmDifference
Height43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Width43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness11.8 mm14.2 mm−2.4 mm
Weight41 g48 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Aluminum better than Instinct E 45mm?

  1. GPS battery life41 h vs 24 h+71%
  2. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · Instinct E 45mm: No
  3. Battery life (smartwatch mode)19 days vs 16 days+19%
  4. Storage4 GB vs 0.12 GB33.3×
  5. Pixel density325 ppi vs 139 ppi2.3×
  6. Resolution (width)390 px vs 176 px2.2×
  7. Weight41 g vs 48 g+17%
  8. Thickness11.8 mm vs 14.2 mm+20%

Why is Instinct E 45mm better than Pace 4 Aluminum?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Sport profiles28 vs 692.5×
  3. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.27″+6%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare