NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Aluminum vs Street X

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum vs Polar Street X

What Pace 4 Aluminum does better (4) and where Street X wins (3) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum
Coros · 2025Pace 4 Aluminum
6.1Score
4 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Polar Street X
Polar · 2026Street X
5.3Score
3 advantages≈ $270
5.3Display6.4
7.1Battery life5.0
4.9Health tracking9.8
3.8Sports & outdoor2.4
3.1Build & durability4.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 AluminumStreet X
43.4 × 43.411.845 × 4513.8
Pace 4 AluminumStreet XDifference
Height43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Width43.4 mm45 mm−1.6 mm
Thickness11.8 mm13.8 mm−2 mm
Weight41 g48 g−7 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Aluminum better than Street X?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)19 days vs 10 days+90%
  2. Offline mapsYes · Street X: No
  3. Weight41 g vs 48 g+17%
  4. Thickness11.8 mm vs 13.8 mm+17%

Why is Street X better than Pace 4 Aluminum?

  1. GPS battery life41 h vs 42 h+2%
  2. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.28″+7%
  3. Resolution (width)390 px vs 416 px+7%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare