NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Aluminum vs 9 Peak Pro

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum vs Suunto 9 Peak Pro

What Pace 4 Aluminum does better (6) and where 9 Peak Pro wins (5) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum
Coros · 2025Pace 4 Aluminum
6.1Score
6 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Suunto 9 Peak Pro
Suunto · 20229 Peak Pro
6.1Score
5 advantages≈ $210
5.3Display3.4
7.1Battery life7.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor2.4
3.1Build & durability9.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 Aluminum9 Peak Pro
43.4 × 43.411.843 × 4310.3
Pace 4 Aluminum9 Peak ProDifference
Height43.4 mm43 mm+0.4 mm
Width43.4 mm43 mm+0.4 mm
Thickness11.8 mm10.3 mm+1.5 mm
Weight41 g64 g−23 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Aluminum better than 9 Peak Pro?

  1. AMOLED / OLED displayYes · 9 Peak Pro: No
  2. Dual-band GPSYes · 9 Peak Pro: No
  3. Weight41 g vs 64 g+56%
  4. GPS battery life41 h vs 40 h+2%
  5. Resolution (width)390 px vs 240 px+62%
  6. Pixel density325 ppi vs 200 ppi+62%

Why is 9 Peak Pro better than Pace 4 Aluminum?

  1. Water resistance5 ATM vs 10 ATM2×
  2. Battery life (smartwatch mode)19 days vs 21 days+11%
  3. Sport profiles28 vs 953.4×
  4. Sapphire crystalNo · Pace 4 Aluminum: Yes
  5. Thickness11.8 mm vs 10.3 mm+15%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare