NewGarmin MARQ Adventurer (Gen 3) added to the catalogSee specs →Advertise
idk.devsmartwatches & bands, compared
  1. idk.dev
  2. Compare
  3. Pace 4 Aluminum vs Run

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum vs Suunto Run

What Pace 4 Aluminum does better (4) and where Run wins (6) — every spec side by side.

Coros Pace 4 Aluminum
Coros · 2025Pace 4 Aluminum
6.1Score
4 advantages≈ $280
Higher score
vs
Suunto Run
Suunto · 2025Run
5.5Score
6 advantages≈ $190
5.3Display7.1
7.1Battery life4.5
4.9Health tracking4.9
3.8Sports & outdoor3.7
3.1Build & durability4.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

Pace 4 AluminumRun
43.4 × 43.411.846 × 4611.5
Pace 4 AluminumRunDifference
Height43.4 mm46 mm−2.6 mm
Width43.4 mm46 mm−2.6 mm
Thickness11.8 mm11.5 mm+0.3 mm
Weight41 g36 g+5 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Pace 4 Aluminum better than Run?

  1. Battery life (smartwatch mode)19 days vs 12 days+58%
  2. GPS battery life41 h vs 30 h+37%
  3. Wi-FiWi-Fi 4 vs Wi-Fi 14×
  4. GPS battery life (dual-band)31 h vs 20 h+55%

Why is Run better than Pace 4 Aluminum?

  1. Weight41 g vs 36 g+14%
  2. Screen size1.2″ vs 1.32″+10%
  3. Resolution (width)390 px vs 466 px+19%
  4. Sport profiles28 vs 32+14%
  5. Pixel density325 ppi vs 353 ppi+9%
  6. Thickness11.8 mm vs 11.5 mm+3%
Specifications

Side by side

To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare